ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes POD L GF vs POD F GF in Asian Eyes
Prospective, randomised, controlled, single-surgeon, single-center clinical study to compare the clinical outcomes of two trifocal IOLs differing in the dominance of additional power. The investigational device POD L GF shows dominance for the intermediate addition (+1.75 D), whereas the control device POD F GF shows dominance for the near addition (+3.5 D). Implantation of the IOLs is bilaterally.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Study to Investigate Outcomes of Trifocal Toric IOL POD FT in Asian Eyes#889356
- Clinical Evaluation and Comparison of the Tecnis Symfony Optiblue and Tecnis Symfony IOLs#862384
- Clinical Investigation of the Visual Outcomes and Safety of a Trifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL) in a Korean Population#1072287
- Effect of Optic Edge Design in a Silicone Intraocular Lens on Posterior Capsule Opacification#844648
- Clinical Investigation of the Visual Outcomes and Safety of a Trifocal Toric IOL in an Asian Population#852940
Record · ID 1174261
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive