Europe PMC
open access
CC BY 4.0
A system for independent evaluation of clinical prediction models while preserving intellectual property and data privacy
Abstract Background Evaluating clinical prediction models (CPMs) in new patients and settings is essential for building the evidence needed to support their adoption in practice. Independent evaluation by researchers distinct from the CPM developers is particularly valued, yet re
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- FAIR CLINICAL RISK PREDICTION: STATISTICAL METHODS FOR EVALUATING MODEL ACCURACY AND SUBGROUP FAIRNESS#929199
- Monitoring strategies for continuous evaluation of deployed clinical prediction models.#263021
- Dynamic prediction intervals for survival times#997294
- Misaligned Clinical Risk Classification and Cost Asymmetry in Open-Weight Large Language Models#1050188
- PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies#6703
Record · ID 1175118
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive