OpenAlex
metadata only
Defining Red Lines: Philosophical and Legal Analysis of ’Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices’ in Artificial Intelligence Law
As artificial intelligence increasingly permeates everyday life—acting as both a developmental ally and a skilled mediator of human thought—the European Union has responded with the AI Act. This legislation aims to categorize AI systems based on the risk and influence they exert on society. However,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Understanding the Regulation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Under International Law#1176553
- Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement Operations: The EU AI Act as the Governing Legal Standard#1159915
- THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES#210143
- Uses and Abuses of AI Ethics#709276
- DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE#299576
Record · ID 1176156
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive