PhilArchive
open access
Neurophilosophy: A Bridge Between Science and Contemporary Philosophy
Scientific discoveries must have more impact on philosophy (Bechtel, 2001. Part. I.I.). That is the thesis of the American professor of philosophy William Bechtel. Applications of the insights from the neurosciences could perhaps lead to a breakthrough in solving metaphysical and religious questions. Philosophers must assume the task of building bridges between the exact (and cognitive) sciences and contemporary philosophy (Bechtel, 2002. 49). This paper is a critical analysis of the promises of a relatively new discipline: Neurophilosophy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Scientific Practice and the Moral Task of Neurophilosophy#708252
- Epistemic Audit of Representational Defects in Neurobiological Discourse: A Critical Review of Works by P. Churchland and R. Sapolsky#111653
- Neurophilosophy and Its Discontents#742089
- Précis of “Metaphilosophie als einheitliche Disziplin” (Springer/Metzler, 2023)#78501
- Intertheoretic reduction: A neuroscientist’s field guide#711014
Record · ID 117655
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive