OpenAlex
metadata only
Can Data Protection Law Shield the Human Voice? Evaluating the Role of the UK GDPR in Regulating Artificial Intelligence Voice Cloning
Neural speech synthesis can generate a voice recognisable to a human from seconds of reference audio, and the harm extends beyond fraud to a loss of control over a socially trusted identifier. No United Kingdom statute protects the voice in isolation: copyright, performers' rights and passing off pr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Regulating speech on the internet#163670
- The Voice and Speech Processing within Language Technology Applications: Perspective of the Russian Data Protection Law#461833
- Rebalancing Online Speech Regulation: A Model-Sensitive Approach to End Users’ Judicial Protection in Europe#281789
- The Machines Are Calling: Measuring Automated and Synthetic Voices in Unwanted Inbound Calls#1122487
- Democratic Vibes#97106
Record · ID 1177043
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive