OpenAlex
metadata only
The problem of doctrinal justification of legal sources in the context of the theory of legal argumentation, hermeneutics, and Ronald Dworkin's integrative jurisprudence
The article is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the doctrinal justification of sources of law in the context of key contemporary philosophical-legal approaches: the theory of legal argumentation, hermeneutics, and the integrative jurisprudence of R. Dworkin. The relevance of the study is deter
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sense of Legal Practice and Settings of Legal Theory: A Comment to R. Dworkin’s Radical “Hermeneutics”#1178140
- Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research#666667
- The Crisis of Modern Jurisprudence#1177936
- THEOLOGY AND JURISPRUDENCE: A GOOD PARTNERSHIP?#1177896
- Legal sciences towards the issue of the political: The perspective of critical jurisprudence#1178045
Record · ID 1177660
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive