OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Jurisprudence and Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Science
This paper examines the status of law as a science through the lens of Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Science. While jurisprudence is commonly taught as a branch of legal sciences, Popper’s criteria for scientific theory—falsifiability—challenges this view. According to Popper, a theory must make testa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- KARL POPPER’S BIOGRAPHY & PHILOSOPHY; DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING UNLESS FALSIFIABLE ; ESSENTIAL FOR A THEORY#725545
- Applied Philosophy of Law - Orientation in a Nervous World? Thoughts and Concepts#90739
- Price Theory, Competition, and the Rule of Reason#1148965
- Two Views of Natural Law and the Shaping of Economic Science#712908
- «Economic Analysis of Law» and Jurisprudence: Differences and Common Approaches#1177912
Record · ID 1177733
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive