OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Less Incorrect Ways of Doing Jurisprudence
Theorists interested in the question of how to do jurisprudence often have the aspiration of developing a method that is the correct one. The article challenges this aspiration. Focusing on Julie Dickson’s claim that Indirectly Evaluative Legal Theory is the correct method, I show that any
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- " Rethinking Theory: The Question of Distributive Justice in Jurisprudence "#1177881
- Jurisprudence theory and context#335382
- Natural Type of Law Understanding as Jurisprudence Activity Based Theory Basis#335545
- The Crisis of Modern Jurisprudence#1177936
- The problem of theoretical-methodological “refinement” of jurisprudence#1177778
Record · ID 1177771
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive