OpenAlex
metadata only
The burning armchair: can jurisprudence be advanced by experiment?
Is the field of general jurisprudence catching up – or is it simply getting distracted? Whereas legal philosophy has always featured claims about the content of the folk concept of law, it is only in the last few years that it has begun to self-consciously test those claims. Kenneth Himma’s recent r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Developments in English Jurisprudence - 1953-1963#1178160
- The impact of legal science on contemporary jurisprudence research#1177841
- Liberalism and Legal Science: The Jurisprudence of Morris Raphael Cohen#1177756
- Citizen Science for Citizen Access to Law#679256
- Is Subjectivity Possible - the Post-Modern Subject in Legal Theory#269787
Record · ID 1177802
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive