OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Wait, what are we fighting about? – Kelsen, Ehrlich and the reconciliation of normative jurisprudence and sociology of law
The 1915-1917 debate between Ehrlich and Kelsen is a fundamental debate in legal theory, between normative jurisprudence and sociology of law. Although both professors see themselves as being on opposite sides of the legal theoretical spectrum, this article offers the possibility that perhaps both t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Jurisprudence – Theories of private law#1177762
- The Character of Legal Theory#270052
- Social Identity and Legal Personality – Collective Entities as Legal Entities?#1177947
- REFLECTIONS ON THE CORRELATION OF GENERAL THEORETICAL LEGAL SCIENCES#1178122
- Rigid Legal Theories, with Contractual Illustrations#1178002
Record · ID 1177856
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive