OpenAlex
metadata only
Legal Formalism vs Moral Humanism in Contemporary Jurisprudence: A Critical Appraisal
In this paper, the author takes a critical look at the conflict between legal formalism and moral humanism in the present-day jurisprudence. Legal formalism is a preference for the meaningful application of the law through hard and fast rules, deductive knowledge, and adherence to moral humanism, wh
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- "Law As…": Theory and Practice in Legal History#270161
- Common Opinions and Collective Testimonies in Legal Humanism#165072
- The law of persons today: at the margins of jurisprudence#269801
- Introduction to legal philosophy#490394
- Universal Jurisprudence and the Case for Legal Humanism#335544
Record · ID 1177967
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive