OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY-NC 4.0
Implications of Correspondence Inference Attribution Theory & Behavioral Jurisprudence Theory: Judge's Conciderations on Conscience
Introduction: This article analyzes the implications of the attribution correspondence inference theory and whether the urge of conscience as affect in the Defendant is the reason for the abolition of the sentence? also behavioral jurisprudence theory on judges' considerations, where it's often a di
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The doctrinal foundations of the institute of judicial discretion in legal theory#1178223
- Subjectivation, traduction, justice cognitive#741912
- Tort Law and Commonsense Justice: Convergence and Divergence#1115438
- Legal dispositionism and artificially-intelligent attributions#679316
- 15 U.S.C. § 16 — Judgments#567840
Record · ID 1177982
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive