PhilArchive
open access
Censoring Emotional Discourse
This paper critiques of the privileging of seriousness in modern scholarship and particularly in the humanities, on account of its purported neutrality and objectivity, the resulting foreclosing of all other emotions and insights, and the potentially subversive and enriching potential of laughter, as discussed in Karl Marx’s dichotomy of laughter and seriousness.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reimagining Happiness in the Absurd: A Study of Camus’s The Stranger, The Plague, and The Myth of Sisyphus#101379
- A Laugh and a Sin: The Obscene as Europe’s Last High Culture (Common Theory for Mat and Comic)#697210
- Laughter in Nietzsche’s Thought#739214
- Reverting to Unanalyzed Externalization: The Logical Culmination and Paradox of Internal Self-Correction within the Lukacs Tradition#692642
- Ethical consensus and the truth of laughter: the structure of moral transformations#779033
Record · ID 117807
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive