OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY-NC 4.0
Two types of jurisprudence from a perspective of critical rationalism
Our understanding of legal ideas is most reflected in the ability to categorize them unambiguously. At the same time, modern science faces many difficulties in categorizing legal ideas. Problems associated with categorizing complex authors such as F.C. von Savigny or L.L. Fuller are just one example
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Modern Trend and Role of Jurisprudence in this Era#1178077
- ON SCIENTIFIC CRITICISM IN JURISPRUDENCE#1177979
- What Is Jurisprudence? Is It Still Justinian's Science of Things Divine and Humann? Is It Still The Science of the Just and the Unjustt?#1177919
- Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research#666667
- Expounding the Place of Legal Doctrinal Methods in Legal-Interdisciplinary Research#269818
Record · ID 1178188
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive