OpenAlex
metadata only
How to Fix Legal Scholarmush
Legal scholars often fail to distinguish descriptive claims about what the law is from normative claims about what it ought to be.The distinction couldn't be more important, yet scholars frequently mix it up, leading them to mistake legal authority for moral authority, treat current law as a justifi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 1#270202
- Anthropology of law#221990
- The COLIEE 2025 Competition on Legal Information Extraction and Entailment: Overview, Discussion, and Dataset Expansion.#122833
- Folk Moral Semantics, Moral Naturalism, and Moral Descriptivism#691352
- Earth Jurisprudence: The Moral Value of Nature#269821
Record · ID 1178190
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive