OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Implementing Computational Law in Wolfram Language for the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
How do we govern AI systems whose reasoning we cannot fully inspect? Governance does not require understanding a system's reasoning. It requires stating what the system is obliged, permitted, and forbidden to do, and checking whether it complied. I present an implementation of Reified Input/Output L
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Category Error in Contemporary AI Safety Discourse and Why Non-Sentient Systems Cannot Be Moral Machines#719047
- ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ALGORITHMIC SOVEREIGNTY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LAW TOME I: PROJECTOR AND LUMINOCORE ARCHITECTURES#244576
- ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ALGORITHMIC SOVEREIGNTY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LAW TOME I: PROJECTOR AND LUMINOCORE ARCHITECTURES#244575
- ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ALGORITHMIC SOVEREIGNTY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LAW TOME I: PROJECTOR AND LUMINOCORE ARCHITECTURES#244574
- ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ALGORITHMIC SOVEREIGNTY AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LAW TOME I: PROJECTOR AND LUMINOCORE ARCHITECTURES#244573
Record · ID 1178261
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive