OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Interpreting Performance-Based Requirements by Use of Legal Reasoning
Despite significant advancements in Automatic Compliance Checking (ACC), widespread practical implementation remains limited, particularly for qualitative and performance-based requirements, due to interpretative ambiguities. This study addresses this challenge by integrating legal reasoning methods
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pragmatic argument for an acceptance-refusal asymmetry in competence requirements#103435
- Modelling Value-Oriented Legal Reasoning in LogiKEy#1178429
- Modelling Value-Oriented Legal Reasoning in LogiKEy#1178427
- ARCHER: Agentic Rule and Compliance Harness for Executable Regulations#1144856
- Compliance in Databases: A Study of Structural Policies and Query Optimization#31349
Record · ID 1178292
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive