OpenAlex
metadata only
Risk-Weighted Hallucination Scoring for Legal Answers: A Conceptual Framework for Trustworthy AI in Law
computer-scienceconceptual-frameworkempirical-legal-studiesfield-mathematicslegal-professionlegal-research
Large Language Models (LLMs) bring revolutionary changes to legal practice yet their ability to produce fake legal information through hallucination remains a major obstacle. The current evaluation methods for legal hallucinations fail to meet the needs of the legal field because they measure factua
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Literacy for Legal AI Systems: a Practical Approach#1178614
- Essay on the use of the concept of legal fact by AI/ALGORITHM/S technology#1177931
- Leveraging LLM agents and knowledge models for automated legal reasoning#1178520
- What's in a Name? Legal Fictions and Philosophical Fictionalism#107232
- Legal Ai For All: Reducing Perplexity And Boosting Accuracy In Normative Texts With Fine-Tuned Llms And Rag#20627
Record · ID 1178309
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive