OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors
The introduction of large public legal datasets has brought about a renaissance in legal NLP. Many of these datasets are comprised of legal judgements - the product of judges deciding cases. This fact, together with the way machine learning works, means that several legal NLP models are models of ju
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges#335692
- Revolutionising the Legal Industry: The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Law#964481
- jurBERT: A Romanian BERT Model for Legal Judgement Prediction#679119
- Implications and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Domain#187106
- DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE#299576
Record · ID 1178361
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive