OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Label Indeterminacy in AI & Law
Machine learning is increasingly used in the legal domain, where it typically operates retrospectively by treating past case outcomes as ground truth. However, legal outcomes are often shaped by human interventions that are not captured in most machine learning approaches. A final decision may resul
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Common Law Development and Uncommon Outcomes: Preparation, Characterization, and the Limits of Legal AI#30978
- Sustainable Legal Informatics Based On The Triple-Bottom-Line Plus AI#1178253
- SCM-based Fairness and Faithful Explainability for Legal Document Classification#1154668
- Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learning#1036711
- Exploring LLMs Applications in Law: A Literature Review on Current Legal NLP Approaches#479550
Record · ID 1178378
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive