OpenAlex
metadata only
A SURVEY ON SUMMARIZATION OF LEGAL TEXTS
artificial-intelligencecomputer-sciencedata-sciencenatural-language-processingpolitical-sciencesentence
The task of summarizing legal texts is of paramount importance in facilitating access to legal knowledge. This survey paper critically reviews and analyzes diverse methodologies applied to the challenging task of summarizing legal texts. In the supervised realm, models such as GIST, SummaRuNNer, and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Briefly: AI-Powered Legal Document Summarization System#362973
- Leveraging LLM agents and knowledge models for automated legal reasoning#1178520
- Legal merit arguments, legal semiotics and the design of legal knowledge-based systems#679267
- Proceedings of the International Workshop on Methodologies for Translating Legal Norms into Formal Representations (LN2FR 2022) in association with 35th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2022)#1178308
- Beyond Scores: Understanding LLM-as-a-Judge Mechanisms in Summarization Evaluation#627670
Record · ID 1178437
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive