OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Computational Normative Decision Support Structures of Forensic Interpretation in the LegalProcess
A broad range of questions at various instances in the legal process can be stated and analysed in terms of formal decision theoretic models, with results conveyed in graphical terms, such as decision trees. However, the real-world decision problems encountered by the participants of a legal process
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How well do SOTA legal reasoning models support abductive reasoning?#679314
- On an ‘evolutionary’ theory of legal systems#1177929
- Automated legal reasoning with discretion to act using s(LAW)#679092
- Interpreting Legal Standards of Proof: An Experimental Study of Probabilistic Decision-Making#177574
- The Philosophy of Legal Proof#77374
Record · ID 1178439
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive