OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
AugAbEx: Bridging Abstractive and Extractive Legal Summarization
Automatic summarization of legal judgments liberates law professionals from heavy cognitive burden due to the complexity of the language, context-sensitive legal jargon, and the length of the document. Caveats of abstractive summarization for legal documents, revealed in recent studies, have impelle
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LexCLiPR: Cross-Lingual Paragraph Retrieval from Legal Judgments#1178507
- Improving Argument Saliency Coverage in Small LLMs for Long Legal Opinion Summarization via Sequence-Level Distillation#799137
- Improving Argument Saliency Coverage in Small LLMs for Long Legal Opinion Summarization via Sequence-Level Distillation#797714
- Using Argument Mining for Legal Text Summarization#679110
- Treatment of Legal Sentences Including Itemization Written in Japanese, English and Vietnamese#69014
Record · ID 1178461
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive