OpenAlex
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Bridging Ethics and Law in AI Systems with a Structured Rule Language
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems often need to follow both ethical and legal rules. Sometimes, these rules can conflict. For example, a healthcare AI may need patient consent (ethical rule), but the law might allow data sharing in emergencies (legal rule). This paper introduces a domain-specific
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Using Edge Cases to Disentangle Fairness and Solidarity in AI Ethics#703643
- Digital Law: Navigating Rights and Regulations in the Tech Era#1178583
- High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare#679067
- Law Artificial Intelligence in Warfare: Legal and Humanitarian Challenges Under International Humanitarian Law#1176670
- Justice in the age of algorithms: can AI weigh morality?#79508
Record · ID 1178600
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive