PsyArXiv
metadata only
Two-Axis Institutional Thoughtlessness in Japanese Euthanasia Case Law: A Computational Discourse Analysis of 113 Judgments, 1964–2024
Background: Japan lacks statutory legislation for euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, or treatment withdrawal; case law from the 1962 Nagoya Yamauchi judgment through the 1995 Tokai University four-criteria framework, the 2009 Kawasaki Supreme Court decision, and the 2024 Kyoto ALS convictions h
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Two-Axis Institutional Thoughtlessness in Japanese Euthanasia Case Law: A Computational Discourse Analysis of 113 Judgments, 1964–2024#423371
- Revisiting justified nonvoluntary euthanasia#79348
- Legalising euthanasia for children: Dying with 'dignity' or killing the vulnerable?#758007
- [Existential suffering and autonomy: Contributions to the debates on euthanasia and medically assisted suicide in Argentina].#439174
- Evaluating Experiences With the Newly Enacted Law on Assisted Suicide in Austria: Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study.#28287
Record · ID 1179148
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive