arXiv CS
open access
Benchmarking Candidate Coverage in Typed Decision Models
Typed decision models return choices or distributions over answer options supplied at request time. Accuracy with complete options does not establish whether a model recognizes that a reference answer is missing or avoids rejecting valid candidates. We present a paired candidate-coverage benchmark p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Benchmarking Candidate Coverage in Typed Decision Models#1188065
- Benchmarking System One decision models against trained classifiers and language models for automated decision gates#1154969
- Agentic-Priors: Using Large Language Models to Address the Cold Start Problem in Preference Elicitation#1357593
- Objectivity and Underdetermination in Statistical Model Selection#706006
- Weighted Ensemble Sampling for Rare-Event Estimation in Language Models#1345025
Record · ID 1181696
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive