ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Is Interval Appendectomy Necessary?
Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical problems in children, with 20-35% of patients having perforated by the time they present to a doctor. In these cases, the patient is often treated non-surgically with antibiotics. Once a patient has improved, it is not known whether it is better to perform an interval appendectomy (IA) or to continue a watchful waiting approach. The purpose of this trial is to determine if expectant nonoperative management (watchful waiting) is not inferior compared to IA management after successful conservative treatment of appendiceal mass at admission.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Population#1127865
- Early Versus Interval Appendectomy for Ruptured Appendicitis in Children#1125615
- Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Children#1127701
- Surgical Appendiceal Stump Closure - a Comparison Between Surgical Appendiceal Base Closure Methods, and Appendiceal Stump Complications.#1260126
- Feasibility of Outpatient Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis#1149857
Record · ID 1182731
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive