PhilArchive
open access
Supraclassical Consequence: Abduction, Induction, and Probability for Commonsense Reasoning
Reasoning over our knowledge bases and theories often requires non-deductive inferences, especially – but by no means only – when commonsense reasoning is the case, i.e. when practical agency is called for. This kind of reasoning can be adequately formalized via the notion of supraclassical consequence, a non-deductive consequence tightly associated with default and non-monotonic reasoning and featuring centrally in abductive, inductive, and probabilistic logical systems. In this paper, we analyze core concepts and problems of these systems in the light of supraclassical consequence.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Universality, Truth, and Popperian Simplicity#760167
- Logical consequence in modal logic II: Some semantic systems for S4#736108
- The material and the suppositional conditional#716017
- A comparison of imprecise Bayesianism and Dempster–Shafer theory for automated decisions under ambiguity#75774
- Completeness theorems for modal (sub)intuitionistic logic without a monotonic valuation function#108433
Record · ID 118321
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive