ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Surface Hardness and Wear Characteristics of Prefabricated and CAD/CAM Milled Artificial Teeth
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the 3-dimentional wear )3D) (volumetric loss) and 2-dimentional wear (2D) (vertical loss) and surface hardness of ready-made (prefabricated) and CAD/CAM milled artificial denture teeth. material and methods: In a cross-over study design, ten completely edentulous patients were randomly chosen for this study and given two complete dentures. The first complete denture was constructed with pre-fabricated teeth. The second complete denture was constructed with CAD\\CAM milled teeth. The complete denture teeth were 3D scanned at the time of insertion (T0), after three months (T3), and after six months (T6) of denture insertion. Utilizing 3D surface superimposition techniques, the vertical (2D wear), and Volumatic (3D wear) material loss were measured. The hardness of the teeth were evaluated at the time of denture insertion (T0) then after 6 months (T6) of denture insertion by Vickers hardness test. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software. Paired groups were compared by paired t test. Significant difference was considered if P ≤ 0.05.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Three Dimensional Printed Versus Conventional Heat Cured Acrylic Complete Denture#1071853
- Deterioration of Resilient Denture Liners and Patient Characteristics#800260
- Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture#1293854
- Assessment of Wear and Muscular Efficiency of 3D Printed Versus Conventional Denture Teeth: A Cross-Over In Vivo Study#908756
- 3-D Printed Resin Composite Versus Milled Resin Composite and Hybrid Ceramic Onlays: 2-Year Clinical Performance, Microtensile Bond Strength, Marginal and Internal Adaptation#1231463
Record · ID 1183825
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive