ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With HARA as Compared to Restylane® Lidocaine in Temporary Correction of Nasolabial Folds
* Investigational Device : HARA (Hyaluronic Acid Filler) * Title : A Single center, Randomized, Subject \& Evaluator-blind, Matched pairs, Active-controlled design Pivotal study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection with HARA as Compared to Restylane® Lidocaine in temporary Correction of Nasolabial folds * Sites and investigators : Chung-ang University Hospital(Seoul), Beom-Joon Kim, M.D, Ph.D * Objective : To compare the non-inferiority of HARA with Restylane® Lidocaine for evaluation of the efficacy and safety on Nasolabial Folds
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Lidocaine Patches Prior to Intravenous Insertion#1046851
- Comparison of Compounded Topical Anesthetics#837037
- Local Anesthetics for Pain Reduction Prior to IV Line Placement#1349467
- Efficacy of a New Topical Anesthetic#994919
- Comparing Polydioxanone Thread Embedding Acupuncture and Manual Acupuncture for Nasolabial Fold Reduction#1362688
Record · ID 1185333
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive