ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Per-cutaneous Intervention Based Paclitaxel and Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Bare Stents for the Treatment of de Novo Coronary Lesions (PAINT)
Objectives: PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the in-stent late loss at 9 months of paclitaxel- and sirolimus- eluting stents with the late loss of bare metal control stents. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Safety: To compare the occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days, 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence de Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the occurrence of in-stent thrombosis within 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. Efficacy: To compare the rate of angiographic success among the study groups To compare the rate of procedural success among the study groups To compare the incidence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the incidence of clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years among the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year cost-effectiveness profile of the paclitaxel, sirolimus and control study arms. To compare the 9-month in-stent late loss of paclitaxel-eluting stents to the in-stent late loss of sirolimus-eluting stents To compare the 9-month in-segment late loss among the study groups To compare the 9-month in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis rate among the study groups To compare the IVUS percent neointimal obstruction among the study groups Study Design: In the present RANDOMIZED study, the paclitaxel-eluting stent Infinnium® and the sirolimus-eluting stent Supralimus® will be compared to a metallic stent with the same structure (Milennium Matrix®) but without drug elution for the treatment of de novo lesions in native coronaries. The study will be a multicenter clinical trial and will include patients for the treatment with
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery#915589
- Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stent vs Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus#835524
- Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) With Bare Metal Stent (BMS) Followed by Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent#1282303
- Prospective, Multi-Center, Random. Study of CoStar Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent(Direct Stenting vs. Pre-Dilatation)#824950
- Drug-eluting Stents vs. Drug-coated Balloon for Preventing Recurrent In-stent Restenosis#887495
Record · ID 1185843
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive