arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluating the Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) generally enhances large language models' (LLMs) ability to solve knowledge-intensive tasks. But RAG could also lead to performance degradation due to imperfect retrieval and the model's limited ability to leverage retrieved content. In this work, we evaluate the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- RAG-Safety-Bench: Reliable Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented LLM Safety#999446
- Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation#328727
- The Attribution Blind Spot: Layerwise Trajectory Diagnostics for Source Reliance in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models#1233532
- Feedback-Assisted Trust Propagation over Document Relation Graphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation#819982
- RAG-CT: Mitigating Privacy Risks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems via Scanning Prompt Distribution#1110482
Record · ID 1186329
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive