arXiv (All)
open access
Right Order, Wrong Scale: Auditing LLM Judges for Occupational AI Measurement
LLM judges are increasingly used to assess whether AI outputs meet workplace requirements, but agreement on response rankings does not establish agreement on acceptance rates or occupational aggregates. We introduce O*NET-BENCH, an audit suite derived from an existing survey of 45,796 worker ratings
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Althea: The Fact-Checking--Metalearning Tradeoff in AI-Assisted Verification#1049753
- DA-RAC: Distance-Aware Calibration of LLM Judges for Trustworthy AI Auditing#612389
- DA-RAC: Distance-Aware Calibration of LLM Judges for Trustworthy AI Auditing#610912
- BenchGuard: Who Guards the Benchmarks? Automated Auditing of LLM Agent Benchmarks#141568
- Checkable Is Not Correct: Validity for Verifier Scores in AI Evaluation#113619
Record · ID 1186806
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive