arXiv (All)
open access
Understanding Enrichment in Reinforcement Learning
When rewards are sparse, reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often uses hints or intermediate guidance to generate more successful rollouts. This enrichment biases policy-gradient updates unless corrected via importance weights, but existing methods omit correction or truncate impo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Soft MPCritic: Value-Based Reinforcement Learning for Non-Differentiable Predictive Control#1341379
- A Comparison of Strategies to Embed Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Formulations Solved via Direct Transcription#684200
- A Comparison of Strategies to Embed Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Formulations Solved via Direct Transcription#682425
- Loop-Free Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Sequential Value Recovery with Q-Score Matching#1143922
- Themis: An explainable AI-enabled framework for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback#303270
Record · ID 1187160
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive