arXiv (All)
open access
When defaults cannot be hedged: xVA calculations via local risk-minimization
We consider the pricing and hedging of counterparty credit risk and funding when there is no possibility to hedge the jump to default of either the bank or the counterparty. This represents the situation which is most often encountered in practice, due to the absence of quoted corporate bonds or CDS
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Impact of Default Dependency and Collateralization on Asset Pricing and Credit Risk Modeling#778174
- Bilateral Defaultable Financial Derivatives Pricing and Credit Valuation Adjustment#778167
- The Valuation of Interest Rate Swap with Bilateral Counterparty Risk#778178
- THE IMPROPER APPLICATION OF THE CLEAR AND CONVINCING STANDARD OF PROOF: ARE BANKRUPTCY COURTS DISTORTING ACCEPTED RISK ALLOCATION SCHEMES?#494752
- Credit Markets with Time-Inconsistent Agents and Strategic Loan Default#202755
Record · ID 1187221
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive