arXiv (All)
open access
Discriminating Fixture Coverage in Agent-Infrastructure Verification Suites
Invariant suites and runtime monitors increasingly gate agent deployment decisions, and the evidence offered for any particular suite is almost always a single observation: it passes an implementation believed correct and fails one believed broken. We measure what that observation is worth. Applying
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Discriminating Fixture Coverage in Agent-Infrastructure Verification Suites#1181707
- Arbiter: Detecting Interference in LLM Agent System Prompts#1247347
- AgentDV: Closed-Loop Agentic AI for Hardware Design Verification#1104467
- LogicHunter: Testing LLM Agent Frameworks with an Agentic Oracle#346575
- Verify-Gated Completion as Admission Control in a Governed Multi-Agent Runtime: A Bounded Architecture Case Study#200549
Record · ID 1187606
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive