arXiv (All)
open access
Tracking State Footprints: How Agents Can Transact
Can AI agents transact? We argue that they must: as multi-agent systems (MASs) increasingly write code, deploy infrastructure, modify databases, and call web services, lost updates or stale reads can be catastrophic. Although MASs increasingly execute plans in parallel, current orchestrators do not
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tracking State Footprints: How Agents Can Transact#1181716
- Rebuild Dossier: Mechanically-Enforced Specs for Agentic App Rebuilds, and What Model-Tier Failures Reveal#1048793
- Scepsy: Serving Agentic Workflows Using Aggregate LLM Pipelines#1105012
- Towards an AI Software Factory for Data Systems#1131165
- Towards an AI Software Factory for Data Systems#1122377
Record · ID 1187818
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive