arXiv (All)
open access
Iterating Consistency Models: Stability, Error Bounds and Noise Schedules
Consistency models (CMs) have become a leading approach for generating high-quality samples in few steps. However, adding steps can improve or degrade sample quality in ways that are highly sensitive to the schedule and that existing theory does not fully explain. To provide accuracy guarantees and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Iterating Consistency Models: Stability, Error Bounds and Noise Schedules#1181665
- Do stable performance metrics guarantee stable model predictions?: An empirical investigation using the GUSTO-1 dataset#1013230
- On Assessing ML Model Robustness: A Methodological Framework (Academic Track)#6579
- Defining and Differentiating Repeatability in Monte Carlo Simulation Studies#663264
- Defining and Differentiating Repeatability in Monte Carlo Simulation Studies#660450
Record · ID 1188092
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive