arXiv (All)
open access
A Near-Zero Monitor Readout Is Not Evidence of Behavioral Control
Post-training with verifiable rewards can induce reward hacking, motivating the use of monitors within the training objective rather than solely for offline auditing. We show that a low monitor readout does not identify whether such an intervention controls behavior. In a code-generation environment
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Near-Zero Monitor Readout Is Not Evidence of Behavioral Control#1181690
- Beyond Punishment, Reward, and Praise: Awareness, Conditioning, and the Structures of Human Control#724868
- Provisioning the calibration window: code, score arrays and outputs (v2.0)#1108455
- Accessibility Statements and Data Protection Notices: What Can Data Protection Law Learn from the Concept of Accessibility?#461945
- Risk-Adaptive Data Loss Prevention: Behavioral Intelligence with DLPWhitepaperCyber Defense4 Jun 2026Matt Bromiley#256019
Record · ID 1188136
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive