arXiv (All)
open access
Efficient Reasoning Training Does Not Always Harm CoT Faithfulness and Monitorability
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning allows humans to inspect how large language models reach their answers, and oversee model behaviour. This reasoning comes at an increased inference cost, motivating efficient methods that train models to solve tasks using fewer tokens. However, a common concern is th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficient Reasoning Training Does Not Always Harm CoT Faithfulness and Monitorability#1181686
- Bypassing the Rationale: Causal Auditing of Implicit Reasoning in Language Models#1012117
- To Think or Not to Think: Allocating Reasoning Where It Helps#1077591
- On the Pitfalls of Verbalized Confidence Priors for Calibrating Large Reasoning Models#1116801
- Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback#1122937
Record · ID 1188187
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive