arXiv (All)
open access
LLMs Can Assist with Proposal Selection at Large User Facilities
We explore how large language models (LLMs) can enhance the proposal selection process at large user facilities, offering a scalable, consistent, and cost-effective alternative to traditional human review. Proposal selection depends on assessing the relative strength among submitted proposals; howev
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large language models meet user interfaces: The case of provisioning feedback#1299151
- Human-Anchored Inference for Ranking New Models with Large Language Model Judges#1014189
- LLM+P: Empowering Large Language Models with Optimal Planning Proficiency#16624
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#792877
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#788873
Record · ID 1188270
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive