PhilArchive
open access
Two or Three Strands to the Concept of Ignorance
This article discusses two under-explored strands to the concept of ignorance. Firstly, how ignorance relates to a subject’s degrees of belief; secondly how ignorance relates to a subject’s evidence. I also consider a third alleged strand to the concept of ignorance, which is that ignorance requires some kind of normative failure. I argue that this is false; ignorance does not essentially require any such failure. I finish with some reflections on the extent to which conceptual analysis and linguistic intuitions about the English language concept ‘ignorance’ can be relied upon to illuminate the nature of ignorance itself.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- On Being Ignorant#17764
- A passion for ignorance: what we choose not to know and why#447869
- Ignorance and the Possibility of Error in Relevant Epistemic Logic#76424
- The Root of Criticism in Ignorance: A Formal Analysis#730550
- L'action comme événement: ignorance et sentiment cosmo-tragique de soi entre Kant et Kleist#118404
Record · ID 119058
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive