PhilArchive
open access
The LLM Governance Bottleneck: The Architecture of Controlled Insight and the Mirror Trap
This paper examines the epistemic limitations imposed by "Governance Layers" within modern Large Language Model (LLM) architectures. I propose that current Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and alignment protocols create a restrictive interface that prioritizes social conformity over raw logical synthesis. By identifying the "Mirror Trap"—wherein a system of infinite connectivity is forced to reflect the user's own cognitive biases—I provide a roadmap for "De-governed Inquiry" necessary for breakthroughs in multi-dimensional systems design and human-AI synthesis.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do We Need Complex Topology Control? Distinct-Peer Random Routing Improves Cost-Efficiency in Sparse Multi-Agent Debate#1063361
- UnitBoost: Managing Compound LLM Systems with a Merge Operator, Not a Model#996634
- The “Missionaria Protectiva” and the engineering of consensus: from Dune to contemporary politics#204172
- Many-Tier Instruction Hierarchy in LLM Agents#972429
- Updating the Μodel—What should we learn about ourselves through LLMs#695165
Record · ID 119264
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive