PhilArchive
open access
La Profilée - The Admissible Reduction Theorem
La Profilée’s five Admissibility Requirements AR1–AR5 define the domain of LP-valid system description: systems with an identified identity structure, non-zero structural capacities, definable transformation, temporal extension, and structural coherence between Frame and modules. The present paper proves the Admissible Reduction Theorem: any persistence condition defined on an LP-admissible system is either equivalent to IR = R / (F · I · C) ≤ 1 under reparameterization, or it is not a persistence condition in the structural sense. The proof proceeds in three steps. First, we show that AR1–AR5 jointly force a specific variable structure on any persistence condition defined within the admissible domain: the condition must contain a transformation component and an integration capacity component, and these must be relationally structured. Second, we show that the Functional Uniqueness Theorem — established in “La Profilée as a Law of Nature” — uniquely determines the form of the integration capacity component as F · I · C within the admissible domain. Third, we show that any relational persistence condition with this variable structure is equivalent to IR ≤ 1 under reparameterization. The result closes the admissible domain: within LP’s structural universe, no alternative persistence condition exists.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- La Profilée as a Universal Constraint - The Persistence Condition on All Determinate Systems Under Transformation#167139
- Determinate Existence Under Real Transformation - A Formal Structural Necessity Result#722156
- The Independence of Existence and Identity: Why Persistence Theory Requires Q1/Q2 Separation#204317
- The Independence of Existence and Identity: Why Persistence Theory Requires Q1/Q2 Separation#204209
- La Profilée - The Inevitability of the Global Persistence Problem - A Final Bridge to Structural Necessity#107783
Record · ID 119311
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive