PhilArchive
open access
"Propositions, Properties and Paradox"
Contrary to views that diagnose the paradoxes of truth and related notions in terms of sentences not expressing propositions, or expressing non-paradoxical propositions different from the propositions they appear to express, or expressing multiple propositions none of which are paradoxical, the paper argues that the basic paradoxes are paradoxes of propositions; or alternatively, of sentential quantification. Similarly for the paradoxes of satisfaction: the basic paradoxes arise for properties, or for quantification into predicate position. (In the latter case, it’s argued that adopting the syntactic restrictions of Russellian type theory is not the best way to go.). The basic paradoxes can be handled either in classical or non-classical logic, but the paper focuses mostly on non-classical options.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Some Open Questions about Degrees of Paradoxes#78496
- A Naive Encoding of Russell's Paradox in Type Theory#635709
- A Naive Encoding of Russell's Paradox in Type Theory#633360
- Logic of paradoxes in classical set theories#774255
- Russell, His Paradoxes, and Cantor's Theorem: Part I#113468
Record · ID 119549
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive