ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Intubation Success Rate_Rigid Video Stylet Vs Video Laryngoscope
This study compare the intubation success rate between video laryngoscope and rigid video stylet in cervical spine surgery patients. Half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by video laryngscope, other half of patients will receive endotracheal intubation by rigid video laryngoscope.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine#880480
- Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in < 1 Year Old Undergoing Neurosurgical Operations: a Prospective Randomized Study#1246996
- Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope#1214441
- Comparison of Intubation Conditions of the Articulating Stylet and Intubating Stylet Guided Videolaryngoscopy#1292381
- The Comparison of the Success Rate of the Endotracheal Intubation Between the Stylet and the Frova With Acute Angled Videolaryngoscope#867831
Record · ID 1196019
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive