ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
ERAS Versus Conventional Care Following Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
This prospective randomized comparative study aims to compare Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus conventional perioperative care in women undergoing benign gynecological laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome is quality of recovery assessed by QoR-15 score at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include hospital stay, pain scores, bowel function, ambulation, analgesic consumption, PONV, complications, readmission, patient satisfaction and hospital cost.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ERAS and Postoperative Recovery in Gynecologic Patients: A QoR-15 Study#909075
- Combined Anesthesia for Laparoscopy Surgery in Gynecology#981061
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecological Surgery (ERASGS-01)#1138761
- Comparison Study of Transversus Abdominal Plane, Paravertebral and Epidural Blocks in Laparoscopic Colectomy#905065
- Comparison of Rescue Analgesia Requirement in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Transversus Abdominal Plane (tap) Block Vs Local Anesthetic Wound Infiltration At the End of Surgery#827866
Record · ID 1196187
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive