ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparative Effectiveness of Endoscopic Assessment of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Barretts Esophagus
The hypothesis of this study was that the comparative effectiveness of unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) will be greater than sedated endoscopy (sEGD) in population screening for BE.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Barrett's Esophagus in Patients with GERD#1349248
- Barrett's Esophagus & Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease#1010599
- Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus with Low-Grade Dysplasia#247043
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Esophagogastric Junctional Adenocarcinoma：A Single Center, Case-control, Diagnostic Study#1229294
- Acetic Acid Guided Biopsies Compared With High Definition Endoscopy in the Detection of Barrett's Esophagus#1060099
Record · ID 1197224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive