ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Trans-Radial Coronary Interventions Using A Sheathless Guiding Catheter
Background: The transradial approach is increasingly used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of lower major access site complications, lower bleeding risk and earlier patient mobilization. According to this trend, in the last couple of years at the University Hospital of Geneva the investigators have changed their practice and currently the transradial approach is the most frequently used for PCI. However, the small diameter of the radial artery remains a major limitation of the technique, especially in women or for complex PCI necessitating larger bore guiding catheters. This may be overcome with sheathless guiding catheters (Asahi, Japan), allowing for a standard inner catheter diameter (6-7 Fr), with an outer diameter equivalent to a standard 5 and 6 Fr introducer sheath. Aim: This study is aimed to compare the transradial approach for PCI with a sheathless guiding catheter and with a standard guiding catheter in women and patients with complex lesion necessitating large bore guiding catheters. Material and methods: This prospective study will consecutively randomize all women and all men with bifurcation/ostial lesion of a major coronary vessel (i.e. ≈ 120/year) in whom a transradial PCI is attempted. The procedures will be performed either with a standard 6 or 7Fr guiding catheter or with the sheathless 6.5, 7.5 Fr catheters. End-points: Successful performance a transradial PCI in all consecutive patients which qualify according to the inclusion criteria (technical feasibility). Establish the proportion of procedures performed with no device-related complications (safety). Analyze in details the technical aspects of the sheathless catheter (efficacy). Sample size: The investigators have planed to include in the study ≈ 250 patients in two years. After 1 year of enrollment the investigators will perform an interim analysis and the instigators will decide at that moment, according to the observed end-points, if prolonging the study would
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Randomized Comparison of Distal Radial Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention#887945
- Efficacy and Safety of the Distal Radial Approach#1309353
- Distal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.#1125403
- Is Conventional TR Band Deflation Protocol Inferior to Internationally Developed TR Band Removal Protocol in Reducing Occurrence of Radial Artery Occlusion#1138767
- Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Catheterization in Patients With STEMI#915905
Record · ID 1197309
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive