A Randomized Comparison of UnderwateR Versus Regular Coagulation in Endoscopic Submucosal DissectioN and Third Space Endoscopy

What the investigatorpropose in this protocol is a technique already used in clinical practice. It prevents the risk of bleeding and make third space endoscopy easier, quicker, safer and cheaper. Indeed, we noticed that preventive underwater coagulation of the candidate vessels during the submucosal dissection with the Hybrid Knife (HK), seal the wall of the vessel, resulting in a subsequent cut under CO2 without any bleeding. Such preventive coagulation is likely to be related with the conduction of the current underwater as it focalizes all the power on the interface between the vessel and the water, allowing a soft sealing of the vessel without cutting it. Despite widely used, there is no evidence up to know on the benefit and harm of such coagulation technique. The hypothesis is that the use of this approach in clinical practice, especially when used to coagulate a vessel, may lead to an increase in safety, feasibility and cost-effectiveness, reducing the procedural time, the rate of complications and the need for coagulation forceps in comparison with the conventional preventive coagulation technique under CO2 insufflation. Therefore, this randomized study compares the underwater coagulation technique with the conventional coagulation technique in the CO2 setting during the submucosal dissection in third space endoscopy.